I AGREE WITH TOM ON THIS ONE POINT

| | TrackBacks (0)

Lynne Kiesling

Tom Lenard has a post on the PFF blog in response to my post the other day about S.498. Tom says

One reason I like the Burr bill (and liked its predecessors that he introduced as a member of the House) is that it contains perhaps the only truly deregulatory measure - in the sense of actually reducing a regulatory agency's authority - of any of the electricity bills under consideration of late: Repealing section 203 of the Federal Power Act, which requires FERC approval of property transfers, effectively takes FERC out of the merger review process and puts merger reviews where they belong - at the Department of Justice. This would be a very significant change.

Obviously I agree with that! I also agree that anything that moves us toward performance-based transmission rates is an improvement, although I think that this step is not exactly dramatic or dynamic.

While Tom and I do tend to agree on most things, the remainder of this bill tends to cover issues on which we do disagree, and on which we have different interpretations. The market-based tent is a big one. So I encourage you to check out his reactions and formulate your own.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: I AGREE WITH TOM ON THIS ONE POINT.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.knowledgeproblem.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/140

November 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Contact

Lynne Kiesling
Lynne-at-knowledgeproblem-dot-com

Michael Giberson
Mike-at-knowledgeproblem-dot-com

Archives

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by Movable Type 4.1