The Environmental Economics 'lost green jobs challenge'

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Michael Giberson

Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), co-sponsor of the proposed Clean Energy Tax Stimulus Act, says if Congress and the President don't act fast to enact the bill, as much as $20 billion in investment will be delayed or canceled and and more than 100,000 jobs lost.

At the Environmental Economics blog, John Whitehead says, "Show me empirical evidence":

My contention is that tax credits can increase employment in preferred sectors but this employment is taken from other sectors of the macroeconomic. Employment and unemployment is unaffected in the aggregate.
Are any of the dips caused by a lack of targeted environmental policy? I'll send a free "Drive Less! www.env-econ.net" bumper sticker to the first person who shows me empirical evidence that the U.S. loses jobs from expiration of renewable energy tax credits or some such policy using appropriate econometric methods and the 1946-2007 employment data....

His post includes monthly employment numbers from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics since 1946.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The Environmental Economics 'lost green jobs challenge'.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.knowledgeproblem.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1437

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

October 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Contact

Lynne Kiesling
Lynne-at-knowledgeproblem-dot-com

Michael Giberson
Mike-at-knowledgeproblem-dot-com

Archives

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by Movable Type 4.1