Who would you back: the market consensus or book-writing pundits?

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

Michael Giberson

Tyler Cowen picks the market consensus over book-writing pundits:

Either the current market estimate of inflation is the best estimate available, or you know that it is wrong and you will be a very rich man. I find the former scenario more plausible.

Cowen is commenting on the Kevin Phillips book, Bad Money, recently out.

Of course book authors may be wary of going directly into the financial markets to wager their hard earned cash, which is why I have advocated prediction markets for pundits in which authors would have a chance to back their book-selling punditry with real money. See my post: Separating cheap talk from truly held beliefs.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Who would you back: the market consensus or book-writing pundits?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.knowledgeproblem.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1449

1 Comments

Books take too long to get to market -- market strategies are old. Authors also spend more time defending (promised) positions with words instead of money -- makes it easier to put on blinders. Finally, trade first and write later. That's why we get memoirs instead of predicted successes

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

September 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Contact

Lynne Kiesling
Lynne-at-knowledgeproblem-dot-com

Michael Giberson
Mike-at-knowledgeproblem-dot-com

Archives

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by Movable Type 4.1